I Know Who You Are and I Saw What You Did by Lori Andrews

I Know Who You Are and I Saw What You Did by Lori Andrews

  • AuthorMeg Leta Ambrose
  • Published Thursday, February 21st, 2013
  • Comments0

Lori Andrews’ book “I Know Who You Are and I Saw What You Did: Social Networks and the Death of Privacy” (2012) fits nicely on the bookshelf between Daniel Solove’s “The Future of Reputation” and Viktor Mayer-Schonberger’s “Delete.”

While the title and the proposed constitution focus on social networking sites, Andrews discusses the dangers that can arise from intentionally sharing information online as well as the minute data collection that occurs behind the scenes, which exist in most areas of the Internet.

She spends a chapter on threats to identity (no clear property or privacy protections for the data-based second self), access (no clear protection for connectivity and discourse), expression (no clear protection from ramifications, particularly from employers and schools, for speech online), dignity (no clear protection from hate speech and other threats online because of CDA Section 230), location and informational privacy (difficulties and complexities involved in users protecting their own data and use of data to find legal liability), child rearing (no clear protection from use of information in divorce and custody cases), fair trial (no clear protection from lawyers, judges, and jurors abusing online information both inside and outside the courtroom), and due process (no clear protection from government acquisition and use of data collected by private parties online).

Andrews argues that transferring values, legal interests, and rights into the Internet Age has not gone smoothly. She claims social networks are necessary places for individuals to express themselves and grow, but do not provide the protection necessary to maintain values of autonomy, freedom from discrimination and prejudice, freedom from government surveillance, and connectivity. Andrews argues that all social networking sites should have to respect 10 basic rights:

– The Right to Connect
– The Right to Free Speech and Freedom of Expression
– The Right to Privacy of Place and Information
– The Right to Privacy of Thoughts, Emotions, and Sentiments
– The Right to Control One’s Image
– The Right to Fair Trial
– The Right to an Untainted Jury
– The Right to Due Process of Law and the Right to Notice
– Freedom from Discrimination
– Freedom of Association

In developing these 10 basic rights, the author relies on certain assumptions about social networks that seem questionable. Andrews contends, for example, that “[p]eople came to Facebook Nation for freedom of association, free expression, and the chance to present an evolving self.” (p.13) I do not know anyone that has joined Facebook for those particular reasons (people usually claim “keeping up with friends from high school”). There are sites where individuals go to say whatever they want (e.g., 4chan) and meet individuals with similar interests (e.g., interest specific forums), and even presenting an evolving self can be done, although very difficult (this may be because the evolving self is not agreed upon as a positive aspect of society, as the right to be forgotten debate illustrates).

Another dubious claim is that “Social networks have become ubiquitous, necessary, and addictive.” (p.3) However, many people do not have Facebook profiles and get along just fine (I can personally attest to this) and  according to a recent PEW study, a majority of Facebook users have taken extended breaks from the social network site or have left it altogether.

Whether or not social networking sites are necessary to modern life and whether they all must protect a standard set of social network-specific rights aside, what I enjoyed about this book is the intolerance Andrews has for these audacious and manipulative data collection and use practices. Social networking sites, third party partners, and governments take advantage of users, are deceptive about it, and are not accountable for the harms that result. Like a number of privacy books, the examples are quite frightening (Goodreads review: “OMG. If this book were transferred into fiction, it would be classified in the horror genre.”), but unlike the others, Andrews does not want to spend much time talking about and balancing the benefits of big data or information sharing, which is very refreshing.

The quibble I have with Andrews’ book relates to the neglect of the European Union Data Protection Directive. She mentions it briefly three times in the book, but it is unclear to me why she would not promote the Directive as the global Social Network Constitution with some minor changes (her SNS Constitution holds a very American prioritization of speech). Having been in place since 1995 (work to update the 1995 version was announced in 2010 and a draft regulation was released in 2012), the EU Directive seeks to establish foundational information rights, many of which are included in the 10 rights listed by Andrews. The problems that ensue from a horizontal approach to privacy that grants vague rights and is difficult to enforce across a number of countries are those I would like to have gotten Andrews’ take on, as well as why her proposal would not suffer from the same shortcomings.

Review by Meg Leta Ambrose, doctoral candidate, interdisciplinary Technology, Media, & Society program at the ATLAS Institute, the University of Colorado.

Photo courtesy of Social Network Constitution

Leave a Reply